also, it's worth noting how much more user-friendly the Veyron is - hell, you can't even access half the car's power without a second key. To pop in a Veyron, which was a hot-and-new car with AC, leather, stereo, cruise, nav, traction control, etc. vs. an F50, that has no rubber in the suspension, a gate shifter, and a top that's pretty difficult to install, I think it's no surprise from a driving standpoint. Plus, I don't think the Veyron was ever really intended to be a collector car in the same sense of an F50. If it makes you feel any better though, we're seeing people drive LaFerraris, P1s, 918S, etc. a whole heck of a lot more now (even if there are more made, I think the comfort aspect for older folks goes a long way).
There are 450 veyrons in the world, 150 or so in the us. but there are only about 250 to 300 f50s in the world and about 70 in the us, and they are less seen because most of them are in private collections or stored somewhere where spotting them isn't legal like ferrari dealerships or cars and coffee's. so it kinda makes since there are some of the most collectable ferraris out there.
It's nuts to think the F50 is more than 4 times as rare on this website as the Veyron, yet the two cars were produced in similar numbers, and the F50 has had many more years to accumlate spots. Are F50s more than 4 times as unlikely to see as a Veyron? Why would that be? Doesn't this bother anybody?! It sure as hell irritates the sh*t out of me.
Join our weekly update alert so you never miss out on pictures of the finest, most expensive, fastest, and most exciting exotic cars. You'll get alerted to...