Forum  •  Rules!  •  Active topics  •  Search
CLS63 AMG exotic or not?
yes its exotic
 
26
no its not exotic
 
10
 
 
Total: 36
falsely, 30 July 2013, 22:19
Reply      
FanOfSuperCars wrote:
topgearstig wrote:
It is exotic anything with an amg badge should be exotic

Then that means I can put a AMG badge on a Prius and post it!


Yes

falsely
from San Francisco, California
davisvehicles, 30 July 2013, 22:21
Reply      
Optinum wrote:
FanOfSuperCars wrote:
topgearstig wrote:
It is exotic anything with an amg badge should be exotic

Then that means I can put a AMG badge on a Prius and post it!


Yes

That's the best AMG of them all!

davisvehicles
from Milwaukee, Wisconsin
sumosloths, 02 August 2013, 16:59
Reply      
I think if an M5 is exotic then a CLS 63 should be too. With that, I also think that if an M6 is exotic then a CL 63 and CL 65 should be exotic as well. The CL 65 is a beast, not to mention it's worth more than an SLS. I've seen one in my life and I posted it, but it hasn't gotten any popularity because it's in the "Other Other" category.

sumosloths
from South San Francisco, California
drenzo, 02 August 2013, 19:01
Reply      
The whole AMG, BMW M's and Audi S's have got so blurred I don't really consider them exotic anymore. Maybe the SLS and SL variants and Black editions because they are sports cars and classic designs. The CL and S despite costing a lot is more a fat company directors car, and second hand values reflect they are not classics, something I think exotics would really need.

If cars are "exotic" just based on price why are people posting old M5's worth under 20K, and filthy old Rolls Royce's worth next to nothing. Or a 1M or a 840 but no Audi RS's?

How is a plain 911 listed as exotic the most manufactured sports car in the world but not a Jag F Type? Would a Renault Turbo 2 be "exotic" when a Renault Spider is?
Last modified by drenzo, 03 August 2013, 11:58
Deleted account
Post a reply