Davis313, 11 December 2013, 08:27
The Aston Martin Lagonda comes to mind, but I actually like the design in person.
![[http://srv2.betterparts.org/images/aston-martin-lagonda-07.jpg]](http://srv2.betterparts.org/images/aston-martin-lagonda-07.jpg "http://srv2.betterparts.org/images/aston-martin-lagonda-07.jpg")
venomgt95, 11 December 2013, 08:35
i never understood why they but 2 headlight styles on a car. they did that with the F40 and the countach too...
![[http://img2.netcarshow.com/Ferrari-F40_1987_800x600_wallpaper_35.jpg]](http://img2.netcarshow.com/Ferrari-F40_1987_800x600_wallpaper_35.jpg "http://img2.netcarshow.com/Ferrari-F40_1987_800x600_wallpaper_35.jpg")
![[http://www.exoticspotter.com/images/7/6685.jpg]](http://www.exoticspotter.com/images/7/6685.jpg "http://www.exoticspotter.com/images/7/6685.jpg")
Adam M, 11 December 2013, 08:51
venomgt95 wrote:
i never understood why they but 2 headlight styles on a car. they did that with the F40 and the countach too...
The F40 is beautiful!!!!
venomgt95, 11 December 2013, 09:54
i never said it was ugly! im just saying, the double light thing is stupid
Adam M, 11 December 2013, 10:11
venomgt95 wrote:
i never said it was ugly! im just saying, the double light thing is stupid
Nothing is wrong with it, it is another feature of my favourite car
andrewo, 11 December 2013, 11:01
venomgt95 wrote:
i never understood why they but 2 headlight styles on a car. they did that with the F40 and the countach too...
It doesn't have 2 sets of headlights. The pop up ones are only for night driving and the turn signals and fog lights are under the glass lens.
Deleted account
venomgt95, 11 December 2013, 11:08
andrewo wrote:
venomgt95 wrote:
i never understood why they but 2 headlight styles on a car. they did that with the F40 and the countach too...
It doesn't have 2 sets of headlights. The pop up ones are only for night driving and the turn signals and fog lights are under the glass lens.
oh. thanks for the clarification :P
DjShift, 11 December 2013, 15:22
venomgt95 wrote:
never really liked these for some reason...
![[http://img2.netcarshow.com/Wiesmann-Roadster_2006_800x600_wallpaper_01.jpg]](http://img2.netcarshow.com/Wiesmann-Roadster_2006_800x600_wallpaper_01.jpg "http://img2.netcarshow.com/Wiesmann-Roadster_2006_800x600_wallpaper_01.jpg")
I dont like Weismanns either.
Chloe, 11 December 2013, 16:53
DjShift wrote:
McLaren F1 is the ugliest IMO.
What in it is ugly? I personally think it's beautiful, and timeless, ask a random guy and he'd probably think its from 2005 or something (while its from 1992). But if I try to think about it, it's very average, there's nothing really that stands out, it's pretty tame actually from the outside. But I can't imagine what aspects of it would one consider ugly, even to the extend of declaring it the ugliest exotic ever?
Deleted account
venomgt95, 11 December 2013, 17:09
Chloe wrote:
DjShift wrote:
McLaren F1 is the ugliest IMO.
What in it is ugly? I personally think it's beautiful, and timeless, ask a random guy and he'd probably think its from 2005 or something (while its from 1992). But if I try to think about it, it's very average, there's nothing really that stands out, it's pretty tame actually from the outside. But I can't imagine what aspects of it would one consider ugly, even to the extend of declaring it the ugliest exotic ever?
reserve that title for the Laferrari :P
